Wednesday, September 26, 2012


"Wikis for Critical Thinking and Contextual Application"
 

This week, those of us in EDACE 765, are expanding our horizons and those of our “students”, to include both critical thinking and contextual applications to the wonderful world of the Wiki environment.

Based upon last week’s lesson plan entitled:

 
Happy, Healthy, Hunger Haunting Snacks Kids Will Love,

the design of creating healthy snacks for children will fit appropriately into the area of
contextual application:

As stated in West & West (2009) “contextual learning is based on the premise that learning and meaning emerge from the relationship between content and context” (p. 101).  It is important to understand that it is the “context (environment/problem) that gives meaning to the content” (p. 101)

The above lesson plan will fit the application needed for:
Event Plan

(Adapted from West & West, 2009)

The fact that details needed to plan the/any event (i.e. presentation of healthy snack ideas) can change frequently, building and maintaining a set of [menu/snack] ideas regarding shared documents can aid the entire team in developing the specific details needed to be productive and organized.

The Wiki designed for this project will have a Home Page, Agenda, Planning Page and Management Tips.

Home Page will need to include:

·         Title

·         Date

·         Description of event (presentation of snack ideas)

Agenda will need to include:

·         Titles: Happy, Healthy, Hunger Haunting Snacks Kids Will Love

·         Who will present snack ideas

·         Times of presentation

·         Where presentation of information will be presented

Planning Pages will need to include:

·         Tasks (exploring and designing snack recipes)

·         Budget and expense tracking (cost of food items: venue is free)

·         Marketing and promotion (what audience will be targeted)

·         Evaluation (for both students and audience)

A spread sheet, such as Excel or Google Spreadsheets (part of Google Docs) could be utilized to aid in the of tracking expenses.

Students can use other forms of technology such as Skype, conference calls, virtual classroom sites (i.e. Wimba) email, group message boards or other Wikis to share ideas and track the developmental process of the event and healthy snack designs.

Good communication among the event planners (students/caregivers) will optimize the productivity and ultimately the success of the project outcome.

The link below provides a great tutorial regarding the impact a Wiki can have on planning an event and the ease of using a Wiki.   The video discusses the importance of communicating in the “virtual commons” and provides an easy format for getting started.




The above example can aid your team in producing your event and tracking the progress each team member is making.  The Wiki, as part of the learning process, can help reduce the chance of individuals completing the same task, overlooking critical details related to the project and add clarity and dimension to the finished product.

Why, you might be asking, as a learner, is this assignment necessary? The following quote from West & West (2009), gives a wonderful explanation of contextual learning…“As students mature and advance in their learning, it becomes necessary to give them opportunities to apply and transfer their developing skills to a variety of new problems and situations” (p. 101).

Good luck and have fun!

As always, feel free to contact your instructor with thoughts, comments or concerns.

 

Grading Rubric

"Wiki for Critical Thinking and Contextual Application"

Child Nutrition 101

On-Line Course Fall 2012

(40 points possible)

The Wiki for Critical Thinking and Contextual Application Lesson Plan will be graded on four criteria; active use of appropriate resources, relevant nutrition information, reflective/new experiences for parent/caregiver for children 2-3 years of age and promotion of group learning.  The following rubric describes the performance standards for the criteria listed in the left column.  This rubric will be used to grade any future lesson planning/Wiki activities for Child Nutrition 101: Fall 2012.

 

_________Collaborative Effort: 20 points. (This score will be applied to individuals, not the overall group) All assigned students have contributed to the content and design of the Happy, Healthy, Hunger Haunting Snacks Kids Will Love Wiki for Contextual Application Lesson Plan Assignment.  Each individual learner brings a variety of strengths and contributes in areas specific to their strengths/interests regarding the project needs.  All learners share in the work, creation, proofreading and fact checking of the overall activity.

 

__________Wiki/Lesson Plan Content: 10 points.  Students will include a variety of resources, including resources gained inside and outside of class (relevant and reputable) used to complete information needed to meet lesson plan objectives.  Cultural diverseness is evident and sensitive to individual needs. Content is organized in a clear and logical manner.  All information is accurate and appropriate grammar is employed and display during event presentation.

 

__________Visual Appeal and Interactivity: 10 points.  Graphics (and audio/videos, if possible/desired) are used to enhance the message of healthy snack ideas for age group targeted (children 2-5 years of age) and target audience (parent/caregivers).  Final project should not be cluttered or hard to read/visualize/understand and able to be used by a variety of individuals within the target audience group and audience.  The end-product will demonstrate the learners have gained new information and insight regarding healthy snack ideas for target audience and able to present appropriately in a diverse group setting.  The snack ideas are “user friendly” and have a broad appeal to a variety of cultural people groups.

 

References:

Kansas State University College of Education.  Department of Educational Leadership. Syllabus: EDACE 765: Adult Learners and Integrating Technology into the Curriculum. Fall 2012

West, J., & West, M. (2009).  Using Wikis for online collaboration.  San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass

Wikis in plain English.  Retrieved from

 

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Wikis for Collaborative Learning and Knowledge Construction; EDACE 765

ATTENTION ALL
WIKI "WANNABEES"
 
This week's challenge for all of us (from or "fearless facilitator") is to create a lesson plan using the Wiki as a means for the students to construct knowledge. 
 
Below please find my Lesson Plan titled:
 
"Happy, Healthy, Hunger Haunting Snacks Children Will Love"
 
 
 
Lesson Plan
EDACE 765: Fall 2012
September 19, 2012
 
Students of Child Nutrition 101 (on-line course) need to complete the activity below (as the “parent/caregiver”), working in small groups, and using resources from a variety of sources: class materials, outside educational publications, personal experience/ideas and technology. Integrating technology into the assignment such as Wikis, websites, blogs, etc. will add to the enrichment of the experience and the overall learning objectives and provide a new learning dimension to the activity.  Please visit the following websites for information regarding Wiki www.wikipedia.org or www.wikiversity.org and blog http://youtu.be/rA4s3wN_vK8 development. You may also create your own Wiki or blog accounts by using the following links http://docs.google.com or www.wetpaint.com and http://www.blogger.com. Refer to the attached rubric for grading criteria.  As always, please feel free to contact your instructor/facilitator with any questions, concerns or challenges you may have regarding this assignment. 
“Happy Snacking”
Title:  Healthy, Happy, Hunger Haunting Snacks Kids Will Love
Target Audience: Parents/caregivers of children 2-5 years of age; with a variety culture diverse people groups (in mind).
Objectives:  The parent/caregiver (student) will be able to describe and plan 3 morning and 3 afternoon/evening snacks, using variety healthy food choices, for the appropriate age/people group targeted.  (The student/learner will use the Wiki as the main “template” for conducting and completing the assignment) 
Teaching Materials Needed, Including Handouts:  Access to materials providing a variety of healthy food choices, for appropriate age/people group: including use of/access to the internet to aid in finding resources for healthy snack ideas.  Handouts may also be used as references and are not limited to the following titles:  Nutritious Snacks Children Will Like, Give Me 5 Fruits and Vegetables a Day, Hungry and Thirsty, Now!  (Provided during instructional workshop)
Advanced Preparation Needed:  Review of class materials, availability of above handouts, preparation of laptop computers for attendees for access to web resources, and information related to nutritious snacks for appropriate age group targeted.
Class Outline and Methods: To aid the parent/caregiver in the development of planning healthy snacks for children 2-5 years of age, using a variety of both printed and web materials.  Learners may research, plan, execute and distribute information through a variety of resources: designing own handouts/menus (hardcopy), posting information on the web via Wiki, blog site or Facebook.  (The students of Child Nutrition 101 are to act as the parent/caregiver to complete the assignment) This lesson plan will benefit the parent/caregiver in a variety of ways: gaining access to materials/tools that can be used to plan healthy snacks for children ages 2-5 years of age, experimentation with new web resources (Wiki, blogs, Facebook, etc.) if desired, and exploring options of integrating healthy food choices into everyday snack/meal planning activities; fitting their lifestyles and enhancing healthy eating habits of children 2-5 years of age (and possibly the entire household/people group!).
Interactive Component:  Use of web resources; Wiki, blog, etc. working together with a partner during the workshop session and the “hands-on” activity of designing nutritious snacks children will like; with their own child in mind.
Behavior Change Goal:  The parent/caregiver will be able to state at least 2 of the current snacks they giving their child (age 2-5) that may not be a healthy choice and offer new suggestions based upon information gained/researched in current workshop/lesson.
Evaluation from Parent/Caregiver:  The parent/caregiver will have the freedom to express their likes/dislikes related to the lesson/workshop, providing feedback, constructive ideas for improvement and offer information gained from above experience.
 
 
Lesson Plan Written and Approved By:  Jane Doe, RD, LD, IBCLC




References:

EDACE 765:  Adult Learners and Integrating Technology into Curriculum, Fall 2012 Syllabus

Wiki and Blog information obtained from the following web addresses:

http://docs.google.com

http://youtu.be/rA4s3wN_vK8

http://www.blogger.com

www.wetpaint.com

www.wikipedia.org

www.wikiversity.org

 
 
See following page for Grading Rubric.
 
Grading Rubric
Lesson Plan
Child Nutrition 101
On-Line Course Fall 2012
(30 points possible)
Lesson Plan participation will be graded on four criteria; active use of appropriate resources, relevant nutrition information, reflective/new experiences for parent/caregiver for children 2-3 years of age and promotion of group learning.  The following rubric describes the performance standards for the criteria listed in the left column.  This rubric will be used to grade any future lesson planning/Wiki activitie for Child Nutrition 101: Fall 2012.
_________Collaborative Effort: 5 points. (This score will be applied to individuals, not the overall group) All assigned students have contributed to the content and design of the Happy, Healthy, Hunger Haunting Snacks Kids Will Love Lesson Plan Assignment.  Each individual learner brings a variety of strengths and contributes in areas specific to their strengths/interests regarding the project needs.  All learners share in the work, creation, proofreading and fact checking of the overall activity.
__________Wiki/Lesson Plan Content: 15 points.  Students will include a variety of resources, including resources gained inside and outside of class (relevant and reputable) used to complete information needed to lesson plan objectives.  Cultural diverseness is evident and sensitive to individual needs. Content is organized in a clear and logical manner.  All information is accurate and appropriate grammar is employed. 
__________Visual Appeal and Interactivity: 10 points.  Graphics (and audio/videos) are used to enhance the message of healthy snack ideas for age group targeted (children 2-5 years of age) and target audience (parent/caregivers).  The final project should not be cluttered or hard to read/visualize and able to be used by a variety of individuals within the target audience group and audience.  The end-product will demonstrate the learners have gained new information and insight regarding healthy snack ideas for target audience.  The snack ideas are “user friendly” and have a broad appeal to a variety of cultural people groups.
 
Okay, Blogger Reading Group...are you ready for a snack, now??
Here's to Happy, Healthy, Snacking! 
Enjoy searching and creating your own "Hunger Haunting Snacks!"
Happy Bloggning....and snacking!  :0
 


Tuesday, September 11, 2012


Welcome Week Three Wiki "Wantabees"
 
The topic of discussion for this week is:
 
"Wiki's: Pros and Cons for the Adult Learners"
 
 
As I thought about our topic for this week and the fact that I am both an audio and visual learner, I thought it might be fun (sure, just wait!) to begin the blog post for this week with look at YouTube. Yes, YouTube. Just like Wikis, Blogs and Web 2.0 can add to the overall learning experience, so can tools such as YouTube, when used appropriately; in the virtual as well as the physical classroom.  In the article, Investigating Pedagogical Value of Wiki Technology http://search.proquest.com.er.lib.k-state.edu/docview/200157232?accountid=11789 (2009) the authors state “Since the earliest use of the World Wide Web for teaching and learning, one of the most powerful elements has been the ability to engage learners in an interactive format” (Hazari, S., North, A., & Moreland, D.).  Although this concept is clearly stated by the authors, the ability to “engage learners in an interactive format” does not happen by accident or in a vacuum.  Engagement of learners must be sot after, if you will, by the instructor. 

As stated in the text, Using Wikis for Online Collaboration (2009) “With the emergence of the read-write Web, online students have the capacity to become collaborative partners in the knowledge-building process” (p. 19).  The instructor/facilitator must work diligently to foster an atmosphere of mutual respect, shared learning and desired engagement to allow such learning to occur.  Due to the fact I this is the last class in my pursuit of my Master’s Degree with KSOL, I can personally attest that not all instructors/facilitators have mastered the art of on-line engagement.  However, I am happy to say, that out of the countless (:0) classes I have had with KSOL I believe only two of my courses did not qualify to be included in the previous description.  I have been pleasantly surprised regarding amount of mutual respect and the partnership between the instructor, adult learners and other students that I have experienced in this “knowledge-building process.”


The following YouTube video discusses how many different disciplines and students, such as in our class, can come together in a productive, proactive and creative configuration to reach a common goal.  This is an importance aspect of adult education, in my humble opinion.  Enjoy the video…


http://www.youtube.com/embed/NsndhCQ5hRY

The above "conversation" was in essence in response to our discussion topic for this week, although the point of the matter may have been disguised.  Therefore, in regards to the actual pros and cons of the Wiki for the adult learner, there are several aspects to both sides.  The Wiki can allow for mutual collaboration from many individuals, while at the same time promoting team work and communication on a basic level.  On the other hand, those individuals/learners that are not as "Wiki Savvy" as others, may feel at a disadvantage regarding the Wiki.  Personally, I have completed several Wiki's in the past and I continue to fell a little uneasy about the entire Wiki process...I would just rather have a Wimba Classroom session vs. a tech type session!  Wikis have a wonderful advantage in the virtual classroom, allowing for students that otherwise might feel alone, to begin to work with others towards a shared goal.  Wikis are also considered to be "dynamic" meaning, "live" or almost ever changing.  Wikis also have a nonlinear and multi page construction vs. a blog or message board that would have more of a linear or threaded construction.  Wikis allow for more creativity that that of a message board, however, one can argue that the personal blog can offer even more freedom of expression and creativity. 


Well, there you have it!  My official second blog posting!  I am still learning how to work a few of the tools, obviously~I would have rather embedded the actual YouTube video vs. a link; but after several hours of trying, I succumbed to the “link”.  One of our fellow adult learners mentioned in regards to technology it is often “sink or swim”…I would also like to add the portrayal of “dog paddle!”  I have searched and searched for the picture of our beloved Daisy Mae (God rest her soul) beside our former swimming pool...she so wanted to jump in and do the doggie paddle!  I can relate to how she must have felt!!  :)

 
Happy Blogging/paddling…


References:

Hazari, s., North, A., Moreland, D. (2009). Investigating pedagogical value of Wiki technology. Journal of information systems education. 20(2). 187-198.


West, J. A., & West, M. L. (2009). Using Wikis for online collaboration.  San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Adult Education Blogging Experience 2012

This week's "hot topic" is "Blogging; Pros and Cons for Adult Learners"
EDACE 765 KSOL Fall 2012
 
 
 
Our fearless leader, facilitator and KSOL instructor, Dr. Kang, has proposed the following question for the current/future adult educator to ponder...
 
Is blogging the same as discussion board (virtual classroom activity) activity?  Based on our readings from this week (King & Cox, 2011, Chapter 6 and assorted articles) on blogging, discuss the differences (if any) between blogging and discussion board activities and the pros and cons you think blogging brings to the adult learner. 
 

The above question, and prompting of discussion, is worthy of attention and thoughtful response.  As you might have already observed, I am not one of few words; I usually make my thoughts known, in almost any situation; however, I do use careful contemplation regarding the audience and the atmosphere; trying to show common sense, consideration and even compassion as I voice my opinion on various topics.  Therefore, the above topic is something I do have "voice" about and cannot wait to share with you my incredible and valuable insight (:0).  I do have a sense of humor...especially since this is my VERY FIRST BLOGGING experience and I often use humor when I am a little nervous! For more information regarding blogging (and for my own benefit, as well) take a tour around the following site  http://www.blogger.com/tour_start.g  Enjoy!
 
Okay, on to the business at hand.  I think one can see from the above example, that I believe blogging is, in  fact, quite different from a "message board" activity.  Personally, I see the blogging arena to be more personalized and open to true insights, feelings, honest responses and deeper contemplation than the average message board activity.  Message board activities are often used to show more of a "scholarly" understanding of classroom materials vs. a more personal and in-depth understanding of the curriculum.  Although the blogging activities for EDACE 765 will be graded using the "Rubric for Blogging Assignment" (30 possible points, noted!) there appears to be more freedom of expression and personal input.  Our instructor has clearly described what is expected from our blog; engagementt, content and visual appeal, including interactivity.  Meaning, we as students need to be engaged, similar to message board activities and continue to site appropriate references, etc; but the visual appeal and interactivity varies greatly from the message board activities.
 
The "pros" of a blog are fairly obvious (I hope) from what I have discussed above: more freedom of expression, more thoughtful insight, along with more personal thought provoking contemplation on a basic level; although "scholarly" understanding is still expected from the graduate student, the freedom of expression of a blog post cannot been seen as a "con", I believe.
 
As far as the "cons" blogging may bring to adult education, they are still present.  Adult learners, as so humbly noted by Knowles (1970, 1980) "termed the facilitation of adult learners andragogy" (King & Cox, 2011) and noted a "framework of humanistic principals and practices to guide them..." (pg. 91).  Recalling the "three orientations to participation in adult learning" (developed from Houle, 1988); goal-oriented learners, activity-oriented learners and learning-oriented learners, allows us to contemplate how blogging can have a positive or negative effect on the adult learner.  Adult learners need to know WHY they need to know what they know and be able to relate the learning to both personal and professional (usually) experiences.  Will blogging allow all THAT to occur?  Personally, I do not believe we know the answer yet...however, we are part of the exciting and evolving "experiment". 

King, K., & Cox, T. (2011) The professor's guide to taming technology. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

 
Hold on...we are in for a WILD RIDE!
 
Thanks for visiting my very first blog!  Yea, I did it...I think!!  :)
 
Blessings,
Alicia